Search

CAEP has eight annual reporting measures which are used to provide data to the public on program impact, program outcomes, and consumer information.

​​​​​​​Measures of Program Impact (CAEP Standard 4)

This measure evaluates how program completers contribute to student-learning growth. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania utilizes a Student Learning Objectives (SLO) process to assess and document educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards. SLO is a part of Pennsylvania's multiple-measure, comprehensive, system of Educator Effectiveness authorized by Act 82 (HB 1901). SLO serves as one source of evidence of completer's impact on student learning and development. The College of Education contacted completers who are classroom teachers to ask what evidence they have collected that speaks to student learning in their P-12 classrooms. This PDF includes samples of SLO provided by program completers who are classroom teachers at various P-12 levels.

However, because neither the Pennsylvania Department of Education nor the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania currently share the SLO data as explained above, the EPP created a Penn State approved project: “Do College of Education Teacher Preparation Program Completers Contribute to P-12 Student Learning and Development through Effective Teaching Practices” as a continuation of the data collection efforts surrounding Standard 4.1. Emails were sent to 243 completers who had been identified as having less than five years of classroom experience, in order to control for district effect overtaking EPP effect. To date, only four data sets have been submitted for the SLO evidence. The EPP has reviewed the collected data and finds that there is alignment looking at the SLOs with other measures previously collected that program completers do contribute to an expected level of student-learning growth.

However, the small number of participants, even after offering incentives, continues to be disappointing and has significantly limited reliability, validity, and actionability. Planning has begun on the logistics of setting up direct observations of classroom teachers that have been identified by the state in order to supplement and validate the data previously collected.

A data collection tool that continues to provide robust evidence that our program completers who are classroom teachers are systematically measuring student-learning growth is our annual master completer survey. This tool surveys all College of Education completers from all programs, and asks questions relevant to program taken and employment status. For the Summer 2018 survey, 186 classroom teachers from Pennsylvania plus 21 other states and 5 non-US locations provided responses to "What indicators do you use that provide evidence to guide your practice that your students are making academic progress?" Over 95% responded that they use Progress Monitoring (e.g. classwork, homework, student artifacts) as one indicator used, plus 60% indicating state standards, 30% indicating standards of my discipline, and individuals noted daily observations, Vermont Teaching Strategies Gold, constant assessment - formal and informal, PA SAS, project-based learning projects, agricultural task sheets, pass rates on required state exams, and online ESGI software.

This measure evaluates by observation or P-12 student surveys how program completers apply the professional knowledge, skills, and dispositions acquired in their preparation programs effectively in their P-12 classrooms. As mentioned in the Penn State project above, the College of Education contacted completers who are classroom teachers to ask for evidence of their teaching effectiveness that is collected through teacher evaluation tools administered by the school districts, with the same disappointing small responses. The PDF referenced above also includes these teacher observation forms.

Regarding employer perception, until recently data regarding where completers took positions were not available. The EPP employed numerous strategies, such as leveraging data from the alumni association and searching social media to reach out to completers. PDE recently started providing current PA placement data for completers. These data will be of some use for following individuals into the field, however many of our completers do not remain in PA. The data provided by PDE also does not include contact information. Nonetheless, it will be a place to start.

In preparation for the ability to track completers into positions in Pennsylvania, the EPP identified concentrations of recent completers (since 2012) who took positions in varied districts. We intentionally picked schools for this pilot that included variance regarding size of district, suburban, rural, and urban districts, and grade level of teachers taught. Principal emails were found through district websites. Principals (n=17), all with more than one EPP completer in their school, were selected. Each was sent an email with a 10-item survey grounded in InTASC standards and parallel with EPP developed student surveys to provide mechanisms to support validity, with rating scale: not at all, limited, adequate, and proficient. Principals (n=2) responded in reference to P-4; 2 Reading Specialists; 2 Spanish (P-12); 1 Biology (7-12); 1 Cooperative Education (7-12); 2 Social Studies (7-12); 1 Health and Physical Education (P-12); 2 English (7-12); 1 Special Education (P-8); 1 Special Education (P-12). These two principals rated completers as 'proficient' for each standard, except for one. The elementary principal rated the PK-4 completers as 'Adequate' in Penn State teachers use of multiple methods of assessment for progress monitoring and decision making. These data have significant limitations and provide limited evidence as a small pilot with a very low response rate. The EPP, however, plans to conduct a stronger principal survey in the latter half of 2019, focusing on principals who have completing certification training at the EPP.

Faculty colleagues at the EPP have recently received data from PDE on the certification and placement of all educators. Thus, in the future, we will be able to track the placement and retention of all Penn State educators by certificate area (e.g., elementary, middle school mathematics, high school English Language Arts, etc.) and school level (e.g., elementary-, middle-, and high- school) within the Commonwealth, in accord with component 4.3. Further, PDE will be releasing all principal and superintendent emails, which will greatly facilitate effective sampling. Unfortunately, there was too little data from the pilot to address psychometric properties of this scale. Therefore, prior contact with principals we will survey to make them aware of the intent of the survey will be initiated. This should result in increased response rate and adequate sampling. The alignment with InTASC standards and the ability to correlate with completer surveys hold promise the data from the survey will meet standards for reliability and validity.

Advanced Programs: Although the EPP has some of the same tracking completers into the field issues with the advanced preparation programs, there is some data for students completing Principal Certification programs. This program has begun surveying program completers to provide data for its SPA reporting and by looking at the question, "Did you change jobs after receiving your principal certification from Penn State?" the EPP can make judgments on the satisfaction of employers by the percentage of completers who were able to change positions. Of the 75 respondents who completed in 2016-2019, 17 of the 18 who changed jobs, did so into an administrative or supervisory role. Of the 58 completers who did not change positions, 15 were already in administrative or supervisory positions.

The College of Education surveys students after program completion.  These various surveys and results can be found on the Completer Survey Results page.  Beginning in 2017, PDE released Program Satisfaction data that it collected from initial level completers from within their certification application, with additional years released in 2019-20.  The following table reflects these two years of data:

PDE Satisfaction Survey
Survey Questions 2016-17 Agree or Strongly Agree % 2019-20 Agree or Strongly Agree %
My program provider clearly communicated program and certification requirements before program enrollment 85.27% 92.4%
I feel adequately prepared to design and implement instruction and assessments aligned with state standards 94.64% 97.47%
I have sufficient knowledge to teach and work with all students effectively 94.20% 98.62%
My field experiences provided opportunities to work with diverse learners 88.84% 96.08%
I received effective feedback, coaching and mentoring that built my confidence, skills, and knowledge 90.63% 97%

 

Measures of Program Outcomes

The College of Education provides five years of EPP data such as completer final GPA's and the percentage of program completers eligible for state certification upon graduation.  All years show eligibility rates well over 95% at the initial level.  In almost every year, 100% of advanced program completers were eligible for certification.

Graduating Certification Student Statistics

Cumulative GPA-Initial Programs (by academic year)

  • 2012/13    3.63 GPA
  • 2013/14    3.67 GPA
  • 2014/15    3.69 GPA
  • 2015/16    3.66 GPA
  • 2016/17    3.65 GPA
  • 2017/18    3.65 GPA
  • 2018-19    3.64 GPA

Cumulative GPA-Advanced Programs (by academic year)

  • 2012/13    3.88 GPA
  • 2013/14    3.87 GPA
  • 2014/15    3.87 GPA
  • 2015/16    3.90 GPA
  • 2016/17    3.82 GPA
  • 2017/18    3.85 GPA
  • 2018/19    3.94 GPA

 

Initial Programs Teacher Education Students Eligible for Certification Upon Graduation

  • 2012/13   97.46%
  • 2013/14   98.60%
  • 2014/15   98.25%
  • 2015/16   96.37%
  • 2016/17   98.33%
  • 2017/18   98.48%
  • 2018/19   97.55%

 

Advanced Programs Teacher Education Students Eligible for Certification Upon Graduation

  • 2012/13   100.00%
  • 2013/14   100.00%
  • 2014/15   100.00%
  • 2015/16   100.00%
  • 2016/17     98.00%
  • 2017/18   100.00%
  • 2018/19   100.00%

All students completing a teacher preparation program at Penn State must meet program course requirements by passing with a C grade or higher, maintain a 3.0 GPA overall in the program, and pass a PDE-required content exam. The following table of data presents three years of completers with Praxis or Pearson testing pass rates and the average pass score. For programs that have less than 5 students per year, the completer data have been aggregated into one or more blocks to preserve student privacy.

Program Completers with GPA and Certification Exam Pass Rates
AY 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20

Grade PK-4
CEAED PK-4 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers 243 230 204    
GPA 3.69 3.61 3.65    
PA certified 218 198 189    
Pass Rate 95% 94% 93%    
PECT 8006 224 224 218    
PECT 8007 217 217 218    
PECT 8008 318 219 217    

Middle Level Grades 4-8

English 4-8 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers 7 4 2    
GPA 3.44 3.65 3.41    
PA certified 5 4 2    
Pass Rate 83% 100% 100%    
Praxis 5153 178 174 174    
Praxis 5154 157 170 165    
Praxis 5155 170 167 176    
Praxis 5156 172 169 168    
Math 4-8 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers N/A 13 10    
GPA   3.56 3.59    
PA certified   13 9    
Pass Rate   100% 100%    
Praxis 5153   184 174    
Praxis 5154   160 161    
Praxis 5155   185 178    
Praxis 5158   190 184    
Soc St 4-8 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers          
GPA          
PA certified          
Pass Rate          
Praxis 5153          
Praxis 5154          
Praxis 5155          
Praxis 5157          

 

Secondary Science Education

Biology 7-12 2016-2017 2017-2019 2019-2021
Completers 7 7  
GPA 3.48 3.30  
PA certified 6 6  
Pass Rate 100% 100%  
Praxis 5235 171 176  
Chemistry 7-12 2015-2017 2017-2019 2019-2021
Completers 8 5  
GPA 3.64 3.62  
PA certified 8 5  
Pass Rate 100% 100%  
Praxis 5245 177 175  
Earth & Space 7-12      
Completers      
GPA      
PA certified      
Pass Rate      
Praxis 5571      
Physics 7-12      
Completers      
GPA      
PA certified      
Pass Rate      
Praxis 5265      

 

Secondary English 7-12
English 7-12 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers 27 23 25    
GPA 3.61 3.72 3.71    
PA certified 19 23 22    
Pass Rate 96% 100% 100%    
Praxis 5038 181 182 182    

 

Secondary Math 7-12
Math 7-12 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers 18 9 12    
GPA 3.49 3.67 3.38    
PA certified 19 8 11    
Pass Rate 94% 100% 100%    
Praxis 5161 173 175 170    

 

Secondary Social Studies 7-12

SOCST 7-12 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Completers 26 22 20    
GPA 3.53 3.53 3.54    
PA certified 24 19 18    
Pass Rate 92% 100% 90%    
Praxis 5081 173 173 170    

 

One of the measures on program outcome that the College of Education is required to list in its annual report to CAEP is the ability of our program completers to be hired into positions for which they have been prepared. The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) provides a list of Penn State students who have been hired in Pennsylvania and the school districts that have hired them. However, because a significant number of completers choose to seek teaching positions in other states, the College has been working on ways to maintain connections with those students using emails and surveys, so as to include their data in our self assessments.

The following tables reports PDE data on the number of Penn State completers hired into Pennsylvania school districts for  five calendar years at the initial and at the advanced program levels. Please note that 2020 initial completers were new to the job search process, and any very recent hires would not yet be loaded into the PDE system.

Educator Hiring Data
Certification Year Total Certified Initial Teaching in PA
2016 353 140
2017 387 155
2018 361 132
2019 354 114
2020   25
Certification Year Total Certified Advanced Working in PA
2016 153 80
2017 142 76
2018 122 69
2019 136 80
2020   30

 

An example of less formal data was collected a year after the first cohort of the new dual degree CEAED PK- Grade 4 bachelor's program with a one year Special Education PK- Grade 8 Master's degree graduated. Seven completers were emailed asking for feedback on the following questions: Are you working in an elementary school, are you in a general or special education classroom, and do you believe that your master's degree helped you obtain your position or made you better qualified.

Six students (85.1%) responded, and all six reported that they were working in an elementary school. Three were working in general education and three were working in special education. All six reported that their second degree helped them obtain their position over the other candidates. Additional comments described satisfaction with their program, such as "I feel much more comfortable as a teacher" and "I thinking staying and getting my Master's was the best decision I could have made" and "I'm thankful to have had such a great education to prepare me!"

Student Loan Default Rates and Other Consumer Information

(please note that any links that ask for a Penn State WebAccess log in are for registered Penn State students only)

The data below are from the U.S. Department of Education. At this time, college student loan default rates as provided by the federal government are not able to be separated out from the university's aggregate data.

Default Rate as of 2017

School Type                       Percentage Rate

Penn State University                   5.0%

All Pennsylvania Schools             pending

Public Four Year Schools             7.1%

National Average All Schools     9.7%